‘Disappointing’ lack of action on Pubs Code
Audio Description
Login here to listen to the audio description
CAMRA has urged government to rethink its decision to take no action following a statutory review of the Pubs Code which governs the relationship between pub-owning businesses and their tied tenants in England and Wales.
CAMRA wanted to see changes to give tied pub tenants more choice over which beers they offer, including the right to a guest draught ale or cider from local and independent producers instead of having to buy a restricted range of stock at set prices from the pub owner.
The Campaign also urged the government to beef up the Pubs Code so more publicans could benefit from protections and rights when it comes to the way they are treated by big pub-owning businesses.
Without changes to make sure tied tenants are treated fairly and are able to turn a profit under their contracts, it is feared that more pubs will be forced to close and be lost to their communities.
Instead of making improvements to the laws around pubs and tied tenants in response to changes to the industry in recent years, the government decided not to act.
CAMRA campaigns director Nick Boley said: “The lack of action to improve protections for pub tenants and to improve choice for consumers at the bar is deeply disappointing.
“Changing these laws to allow a better range of beers on offer from small, local and independent breweries would have increased choice for consumers. It’s not fair that large pub-owning businesses can restrict landlords to buying certain beers often at above-market value and prevent them from supporting small, local breweries by offering these beers on tap.
“CAMRA is also worried that the existing Pubs Code isn’t meeting its key principles – that tied tenants should be no worse off than other publicans and that they can expect fair and lawful dealing from pub owning businesses. Research carried out by CAMRA last year found that less than a quarter of tied tenants who responded said that they were treated fairly and lawfully, or that they were no worse off.
“The government needs to rethink this decision to do nothing and instead improve the Pubs Code so that we can see a thriving pub sector in England and Wales where the rights of pub tenants are protected, and consumers have a diversity of venues to choose from. Otherwise, the current corporate stranglehold will only tighten, and we risk seeing more pubs shutting their doors and being lost to our communities.”